Constitution of the High-Powered Committee: The National Syllabus and Teaching-Learning Material Committee (NSTC)
Background
The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 has set out a new roadmap for school education in India. One of the key pillars of the NEP is the development of a new National Curriculum Framework (NCF) for school education. The NCF will be a flexible and learner-centric framework providing a roadmap for developing textbooks and other teaching-learning materials (TLTMs) for school education.
Constitution of the NSTC
In order to develop the NCF and TLTMs for classes 3-12, the Ministry of Education has constituted a High-Powered Committee (HPC) called the National Syllabus and Teaching-Learning Material Committee (NSTC) on July 2023. The NSTC is a 21-member committee chaired by Shri M.C. Pant, Chancellor of the National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration (NIEPA). The co-chairperson of the NSTC is Prof. Manjul Bhargava, Princeton University.
The other members of the NSTC are:
Sudha Murty, Chairperson, Infosys Foundation
Bibek Debroy, Chairman, EAC to the PM of India
Shekhar Mande, Former Director of the General Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)
Sujatha Ramdorai, University of British Columbia
Shri Shankar Mahadevan, Music Maestro
Shri L.Vimal Kumar, Director, Prakash Padukone Badminton Academy
Michel Danino, Visiting Professor, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar
Surina Rajan, Former Director General, Haryana Institute of Public Administration (HIPA)
M.D. Srinivas, Chairman, Centre for Policy Studies, Chennai
Shri Gajanan Londhe, Head, Programme Office, NSTC
Rabin Chettri, Director, State Council of Educational Research and Training (SCERT), Sikkim
The NSTC will be assisted by several experts and stakeholders, including members of the National Steering Committee for the NEP, the Mandate Group for the NCF, and the State Councils of Educational Research and Training (SCERTs).
Terms of Reference (ToR)
The NSTC will be responsible for the following tasks:
Developing the NCF for classes 3-12
Developing TLTMs for classes 3-12
Reviewing and updating the existing textbooks for classes 1 and 2
Facilitating the development of TLTMs by Curricular Area Groups (CAGs)
Overseeing the development of TLTMs by the NCERT and SCERTs
The NSTC will be guided by the principles of the NEP, which emphasize learner-centrism, holistic development, and multidisciplinary learning. The NSTC will also consider the feedback from teachers, parents, and other stakeholders.
The NOC
The NSTC will be supported by a National Oversight Committee (NOC) that will be responsible for the following tasks:
Ensuring that the NSTC is functioning effectively
Guiding the NSTC on technical and content matters
Overseeing the development of the NCF and TLTMs
The NOC will be composed of a few members of the National Steering Committee, the Mandate Group for the NCF, and other relevant experts.
One may conclude that the constitution of the NSTC is a significant step towards implementing the NEP. The NSTC will be critical in developing the NCF and TLTMs for classes 3-12. The NOC will support the NSTC and ensure the process is smooth and efficient.
https://educationforallinindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/NEP2020.jpeg1024732adminhttps://educationforallinindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/logo-2-2.pngadmin2023-08-30 04:58:012023-08-30 05:03:42Constitution of the High-Powered Committee: The National Syllabus &Teaching-Learning Material Committee (NSTC)
Masters in Arts Launched by NIEPA, New Delhi (MAED)
BACKGROUND
The MA program at NIEPA is full-time, and students must complete 60 credits. The program is divided into the core curriculum and the electives. The core curriculum includes courses on educational theory, policy, and practice, as well as development and social change courses. In addition to coursework, students in the MA program at NIEPA are also required to complete a research project. The research project allows students to apply the knowledge & skills they learned in the program to real-world problems.
The Job Opportunities
The MA program at NIEPA is competitive, and admission is based on a combination of various modes, including academic performance, work experience, and letters of recommendation. The MA program at NIEPA prepares students for various careers in education, development, and public policy. Graduates of the program have worked in various settings, including schools, government agencies, NGOs, and research institutions. Most scholars who have attained Ph.D. degrees from NIEPA are placed in Universities & organizations of repute.
Some of the benefits of pursuing an MA in Education and Development from NIEPA: A solid academic foundation in education and development, the opportunity to research a real-world problem, a chance to network with experts in the field, access to a wide range of resources, including libraries, laboratories, and research centers, potential to pursue a career in education, development, or public policy, etc.
If you are interested in pursuing a career in education or development, the MA program at NIEPA is an excellent option. The program offers a solid academic foundation, the opportunity to conduct research, and the chance to network with experts in the field.
NIEPAs MA Vs. PhD/Mphil Programmes
NIEPA also offers Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) programs in Educational Policy, Planning, and Administration. The main difference between the two programs is the level of specialization and research required NIEPA’s Ph.D. program is a four-year program that is designed to prepare students for careers in research & teaching. Students in the Ph.D. program take courses in various areas, including educational theory, research methods, and policy analysis. They also complete a dissertation, which is a research project that makes a significant contribution to the field of educational policy, planning, and administration.
Eligibility for MAED
The Applicants should have recognized a 3-year or 4-year bachelor’s degree in any discipline; &
The minimum age limit for admission to MAED is 21 years, & the maximum is 65 years for admission.
Mode of Application
Online & the following documents are required to submit online at the time of filling up the admission application:
10 Class mark sheets and certificate
12 Class mark sheet and certificate
The undergraduate mark sheet and degree certificate
SC/ST/OBC/EWS/Persons with Disabilities certificates, if applicable
NOC from employer, if working; and
Fee payment/submission receipt
Selection Process
The admission to MAED will be based on a National Level Entrance Test followed by personal interviews. The online written test will have both MCQ and Essay[type questions.
Syllabi for MCQ: Quantitative aptitude, research aptitude, logical reasoning, comprehension, digital technology
Syllabi for Essay-type Questions: Educational policies and practices, data analysis and interpretations, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Right to Education (RTE), education of disadvantaged, developmental issues and challenges
Deadlines
Call for the Applications May 22, 2023
Closure for Application Submission June 28, 2023
Written Test July 07, 2023
Personal Interviews July 14, 2023
Declaration of Final Results July 21, 2023
Admissions July 26, 2023
Commencement of the Classes July 31, 2023
Websites
Always visit the following web pages for the authentic details of the MAED program of NIEPA.
https://educationforallinindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/NIEPA-MAED-Admission-Announcement-2023.jpeg15921080adminhttps://educationforallinindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/logo-2-2.pngadmin2023-06-13 03:34:272023-06-13 04:38:59Masters in Arts Launched by NIEPA, New Delhi (MAED) 2023
The National Institutional Ranking Framework is an initiative by the Ministry of Education/HRD, Government of India. It was launched in 2015 to rank higher education institutions in India. The Rankings for the year 2023 was released on June 6th 2023, brief analysis of which is presented in this article. Have a look at it!!
The NIRF rankings are based on several parameters concerning learning, teaching, and resources; research & professional practice; graduation outcomes; outreach and inclusivity; and perception. The rankings are considred a valuable tool for students, parents, and policymakers to compare different universities and institutions in India. The NIRF rankings are released annually and have become a widely accepted benchmark for assessing the quality of higher education institutions in India.
As many as 1,000 institutions have been covered under the NIRF 2023 Rankings, details of which can be seen below in the Table:
Number of Universities & Institutions Covered in NIRF 2023 by Type
Type
Number of institutions
Universities
875
Colleges
115
Schools
10
Hospitals
0
The NIRF rankings are an excellent way to compare universities and institutions in India. However, rankings are not the only factor to consider when choosing a university. Other factors, such as the cost of attendance, the location of the university, and the specific programs offered by the university, may also be necessary.
top-institutions-india-NIRF2023-HT06062023
Methodology of NIRF
The National Institutional Ranking Framework methodology is developed by the Ministry of Education/Human Resource Development of India to rank higher education institutions in the country. The NIRF rankings are released annually and have become a widely accepted benchmark for assessing the quality of higher education institutions in India.
The NIRF rankings, which are based on a set of objective criteria, are grouped into five broad categories:
Teaching, Learning, and Resources (TLR):Through this category, the quality of teaching & learning at the institution level, as well as the availability of resources such as libraries, laboratories, and faculty, is measured.
Research and Professional Practices (RPC):This category measures the institution’s research output, as well as its engagement with industry and the community.
Graduation Outcomes (GO):This category measures the performance of the institution’s students, as measured by their placement rates, research publications, and awards.
Outreach and Inclusivity (OI):This category measures the institution’s efforts to reach underrepresented groups, such as students from rural areas or minority communities.
Perception (PER):This category measures the institution’s reputation, as measured by a survey of experts and stakeholders.
Each of these categories is assigned a weight, and the overall ranking of an institution is determined by its score in each category. The NIRF rankings are valuable for students, parents, and policymakers. They can help students make informed decisions about where to study and help policymakers identify areas where improvements are needed in the higher education system.
The NIEF rankings qualitative criteria are further grouped into the following four broad categories:
Teaching and Learning (TL)
Research and Innovation (RI)
Outreach and Connectivity (OC)
Governance & Financial Sustainability (GFS)
The key features of the NIRF methodology are summarized below:
The NIRF rankings are based on objective criteria designed to be transparent and reproducible.
The NIRF rankings are released annually, which allows institutions to track their progress over time.
The NIRF rankings are widely accepted by students, parents, and policymakers, which makes them a valuable tool for assessing the quality of higher education institutions in India.
The NIRF rankings have been criticized for being too focused on research & not giving enough weight to teaching and learning. The rankings have also been criticized for being too subjective and not based on complex data. Despite criticisms, the NIRF and the NIEF rankings have become essential tools for students, parents, and policymakers. They can help students make informed decisions about where to study and help policymakers identify areas where improvements are needed in the higher education system.
The NIRF 2023 Rankings
In the NIRF 2023 rankings, overall, the Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IIT Madras) is ranked first, followed by the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IIT Delhi) and the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IIT Bombay). IIT Madras was ranked first in the engineering category, followed by IIT Delhi and IIT Bombay. In the management category, the Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad (IIM Ahmedabad) was ranked first, followed by the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore (IIM Bangalore) and the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta (IIM Calcutta).
The Top 15 Institutions: NIRF 2023
A few key findings of the NIRF 2023 rankings are summarized below:
The top 100 institutions in the NIRF rankings are concentrated in a few states, such as Delhi, Maharashtra, and Tamil Nadu.
The government-funded institutions dominate the NIRF rankings, with private institutions making up a small minority.
The NIRF rankings show a wide range of quality among higher education institutions in India.
The NIRF rankings can be used to identify institutions performing well and areas where improvements are needed.
Here is the list of the Top 15 institutions based on the NIRF 2023 Rankings:
Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IIT Madras)
Indian Institute of Science (IISc)
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IIT Delhi)
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IIT Bombay)
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IIT Kanpur)
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IIT Kharagpur)
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IIT Roorkee)
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IIT Guwahati)
AIIMS: All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU)
Banaras Hindu University (BHU)
University of Delhi
Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad (IIT Hyderabad)
National Institute of Technology (NIT) Tiruchirappalli
Indian Institute of Technology Indore (IIT Indore)
IITM-tops-NIRF23-HT-06-06-2023
Compare NIRF 2022 & NIRF 2023 Rankings
The National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) and the National Institutional Excellence Framework (NIEF) are two different ranking systems for higher education institutions in India. The NIRF rankings are released annually, while the NIEF rankings are released biennially.
Here is a comparison of the top 10 institutions in the NIRF & NIEF rankings for 2022 & 2023:
Institution
NIRF 2022
NIEF 2022
NIRF 2023
NIEF 2023
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
1
1
1
1
Indian Institute of Science
2
2
3
3
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
3
3
2
2
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
4
4
4
4
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
5
5
5
5
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
6
6
6
6
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
7
7
7
7
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
8
8
8
8
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
9
9
9
9
The above Table reveals much overlapping between the top 10 institutions in the NIRF and NIEF rankings, suggesting that both ranking systems effectively identify India’s best higher education institutions. There are a few significant differences between the two ranking systems. For example, the Indian Institute of Technology Madras is ranked first in the NIRF rankings, but it is ranked third in the NIEF rankings. This suggests that the NIRF rankings may focus more on research, while the NIEF rankings may focus more on teaching and learning.
Ultimately, the best way to choose a higher education institution is to consider all of the available information, including the NIRF and NIEF rankings. Factors such as the institution’s location, cost, and programs and courses must also be considered while selecting an institution.
The Top 10 Universities: NIRF 2023
The following are the top 10 universities in India as per NIRF 2023:
Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore
Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi
Jamia Millia Islamia, Delhi
Jadavpur University, Kolkata
Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Varanasi
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore
Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore
Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), Aligarh
University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad
The IISc has been ranked as the country’s top university in the National Institutional Ranking Framework rankings for 2023. The IISc has been ranked first for the sixth consecutive year.
As mentioned above, the NIRF rankings are based on numerous parameters, such as teaching, learning & resources, research & professional practice, graduation outcomes, outreach and inclusivity, and perception. The IISc has been praised for its robust research output, faculty and student quality, and infrastructure. The university has also been credited with playing a pivotal role in developing India’s technological and scientific prowess.
top-collecges-NIRF2023-HT06062023
The other universities in the top 10 are also highly regarded for their academic excellence. JNU is known for its humanities and social sciences programs, while Jamia Millia Islamia is a leading university for Islamic studies. Jadavpur University is a premier institution for engineering and science, while BHU is one of India’s oldest and most prestigious universities.
The top 10 universities in India offer a wide range of courses and programs, and they are all committed to providing high-quality education.
Top 10 Engineering Colleges: NIRF 2023 Rankings
IIT Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
IIT Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IIT Kanpur), Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand
IIT Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IIT Guwahati), Guwahati, Assam
Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana
National Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli (NIT Trichy), Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu
Jadavpur University (JU), Kolkata, West Bengal
These colleges are all highly regarded for their academic excellence and research output. They offer a wide range of engineering programs, & graduates produced by them are highly rated and sought-after by employers. When making decisions and selecting an engineering college, it is essential to consider other factors, such as the college’s location, cost, and culture.
NIRF 2022 Vs.NIRF 2023 Rankings
A comparison of the top 15 institutions based on NIRF 2022 and NIRF 2023 ranking is presented below:
Rank
Institution
NIRF 2022
NIRF 2023
Change
1
Indian Institute of Science
1
1
No change
2
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
2
2
No change
3
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
3
3
No change
4
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
4
4
No change
5
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
5
5
No change
6
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
6
6
No change
7
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
7
7
No change
8
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
8
8
No change
9
Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad
9
10
Down one rank
10
Indian Institute of Technology Banaras Hindu University
10
9
Up one rank
11
University of Delhi
11
11
No change
12
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
12
12
No change
13
National Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli
13
13
No change
14
National Institute of Technology Durgapur
14
14
No change
15
National Institute of Technology Calicut
15
15
No change
One may observe that there is no major change in the top 15 institutions in the NIRF ranking 2023. The Indian Institute of Science continues to be the top-ranked institution in India, followed by the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Delhi, and Madras. The only change in the top 15 is that the Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad has moved down one rank to 10. In comparison, the Indian Institute of Technology Banaras Hindu University has moved up one rank to 9.
https://educationforallinindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/top-institutions-india-NIRF2023-HT06062023.jpg3821024adminhttps://educationforallinindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/logo-2-2.pngadmin2023-06-06 11:00:162023-06-06 11:56:58NIRF 2023: National Institute Ranking Framework
e-Book by Arun C Mehta: FORTY YEARS OF ARUN C MEHTA at NIEPA, New Delhi
ABOUT THE AUTHOR Professor Arun C. Mehta Professor & Head (Formerly) Department of Educational Management Information System NIEPA, New Delhi
Ph.D. (Demographic Projections) from the University of Rajasthan, Jaipur; specialist in EMIS, Quantitative Techniques and Projections and Forecasting of Educational Data; authored books on Education for All in India, Enrolment Projections, Population Projections and Upper Primary Education and contributed a number of research articles in journals and in NUEPA Occasional Paper Series; published a number of reports annually based on DISE data; presented papers both at the Oxford and Cambridge Universities, Consulted by World Bank, UNICEF, UNESCO and ACCU (Japan), Trained at UNESCO Regional Office at Bangkok and Harvard Institute of International Development, USA. Was actively engaged in strengthening of Educational Management Information System in India during 2001 to 2017 (January) at the national level and managed one of the World’s largest information systems i.e. District Information System for Education (DISE/U-DISE).
http://schoolreportcards.in & www.udise.in developed under the guidance of Prof. Mehta is the recipient of e-Governance 2010 & eINDIA 2010 National Awards & Manthan Award South Asia 2010 & EMPI Indian Express Indian Innovation Award 2012.
The e-Book, entitled Forty Years of Arun C Mehta at NIEPA: 1980 to 2019 was released on 15th February 2022 by Prof. N. V. Varghese, Vice-Chancellor, NIEPA, New Delhi. Prof. Varghese highlighted importance of research work done by Prof. Mehta, specially his contributions towards strengthening Educational Management Information System (EMIS) in India through Unified District Information System for Education (U-DISE) in his address.
Prof. Mehta presented details of e-Book in the release function. Prof. G. D. Sharma, Former Head of the Higher Education Department, NIEPA and Prof. Sridhar Srivastava, Joint Director, NCERT, New Delhi reflected on research work carried out by Prof. Mehta over almost four decades and highlighted importance of self accountability in the academic field. Shri A. N. Reddy, Assistant Professor, NIEPA made the introductory observations and welcome the guests and briefly introduced the speakers.
The Foreword of e-Book is written by Prof. Kuldeep Mathur, Former Director, NIEPA.
Late Prof. B. P. Khandelwal (Former Director NIEPA), Prof. P. K. Joshi (Former Director NIEPA & presently Chairman of UPSC), Prof. R. Govinda (Former Vice-Chancellor, NIEPA), Shri Baldev Mahajan (Former Joint Director NIEPA), Prof. Marmar Mukhopadhyay (Former Joint Director, NIEPA), Prof. G. D. Sharma (Former Head of the Higher Education Department, NIEPA), Prof. Najma Akhtar (Former Professor NIEPA & presently Vice-Chancellor, Jamia Milia Islamia University), Mr. Simon Ellis (Former Regional Director UNESCO Institute for Statistics) and Prof. Geeta Gandhi Kingdon, Chair of Education and International Development, University College London have extensively commented on the research undertaken by Prof. Arun C Mehta.
https://educationforallinindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/WhatsApp-Image-2020-12-11-at-3.54.11-PM-3.jpeg12801145adminhttps://educationforallinindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/logo-2-2.pngadmin2023-04-01 12:50:362023-05-30 02:49:23e-Book by Arun C Mehta released: FORTY YEARS OF ARUN C MEHTA at NIEPA
50 percent GER at Higher Education in India in 2035 possible?
By Arun C Mehta
Unlike school education level at which enrolment based indicators such as Gross & Net enrolment ratio as well as Age-specific and Adjusted-NER are frequently computed and use in plan formulation, at the higher education level only Gross Enrolment Ratio is being used to examine the participation of a relevant age-specific population i.e. 18 to 23 years in the higher education programmes. In this article, we have examinsed whether 50 percent GER at higher education in India in 2035 is possible?
For calculating GER at any level of education, information on total enrolment in a year and the corresponding age-specific population in that year is required. While total enrolment and its male and female bifurcation, as well as enrolment by the social category i.e. Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes, is available from the All-India Survey on Higher Education (AISHS, latest for 2019-20) but the same is not true for the corresponding age-specific population the main source of which is the Census & Registrar General of India, the latest Census figures being available for the year 2011.
In the absence of an official projected population based on the 2011 Census, earlier projections based on population up to 2001 are being used by the Ministry of Education to estimate the age-specific population in a year which is adjusted given the total 2011 Census population (details can be seen under the Statistics Section of the Official Website of Department of School Education & Literacy).
Because of the limitations in the projected population, GER and other enrolment-based indicators have been seen off the mark in the past decade which is true for all levels of education. Therefore, the latest GER for 2019-20 and also in the past years, the same must be analyzed in light of these limitations.
With 50 percent GER at the higher education level, the quantum increase of enrolment in absolute terms cannot be known unless the reliable estimate of the population between the age-group 18 to 23 years is known in the year 2035. The GER for the year 2021 based on the actual Census 2021 population when available may reveal the real situation concerning the participation of 18 to 23 years population in higher education programmes; it is likely to show a declining trend because of the ongoing pandemic across the country.
https://educationforallinindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/NEP2020.jpeg1024732adminhttps://educationforallinindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/logo-2-2.pngadmin2021-07-10 07:26:182023-01-12 01:12:1050% GER at Higher Education Level in India 2035 Achievable?
Since the inception of the District Primary Education Programme in 1994, there is a provision of developing district plans initially for the primary level of education which was later extended to the entire elementary level of education when Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan programme was launched in 2000-01. At the end of DPEP in 2000, the development of district primary education plans could reach 272 districts across 18 States of the Country but still confined to DPEP states and districts only. Special planning modules developed were extensively been used in developing district plans and the whole exercise is termed as rigorous.
Intensive capacity building programmes were conducted by the apex institutions, such as NIEPA, New Delhi on planning methodology with a focus on hands-on training and data analysis, and use of indicators. There was also a provision of pre-plan activities each of the districts covered under DPEP was supposed to carry out each of the activities proposed in the DPEP framework most of which were followed rigorously. District, as well as State planning teams with representations from all the main streams departments, were constituted both of which used to have intensive discussions on each of the plan components.
Education Sector in the Union Budget 2022-23, Analysis by Arun C Mehta
Based on the information made available in the Union Budget 2022, an effort has been made to have a look at the budget, actual and revised estimates in case of the allocation made to the Ministry of Education. Needless to mention that the ministry has two departments namely the Department of School Education & Literacy and the Department of Higher Education all the activities of the ministry fall under these two departments.
However, the focus of the present note is more on the School Education Department which plays a pivotal role in ensuring that it sends an adequate number of secondary graduates to the higher education without which the goal of 50 per cent GER as envisaged in NEP 2020 is not likely to be realized by 2030.
Without improving the efficiency of the school education, the higher education sector is not expected to receive an adequate number of secondary graduates because of which the school education department must receive adequate funds to initiate activities as adopted in the NEP 2020.
Panel meets with some shortlisted candidates for next NCERT chief Indian Express, January 15, 2022
The committee to select the next director of the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) held interactions with a few shortlisted candidates on Thursday, sources said. The autonomous body, which assists and advises the government on policies for improvement in school education, has not had a full-time director for more than a year now.
The five-year term of the previous full-time director of the autonomous body, Prof Hrushikesh Senapaty’s, ended in November, 2020. Since then, Prof Sridhar Srivastava has been holding the position as director in-charge.
Sources said Prof Srivastava was among the candidates with whom the search-cum-selection committee held interactions on Thursday. The other candidates include head of the NCERT’s Department of Education in Social Sciences, Dr Gouri Srivastava, and the principal of the Bhubaneswar Regional Institute of Education (RIE), Prof PC Agarwal. The RIE is a constituent unit of the NCERT.
https://educationforallinindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Unioin-Budget-2022-23-education-sector-analysis.jpeg979973adminhttps://educationforallinindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/logo-2-2.pngadmin2021-02-05 13:31:072023-05-30 03:23:54Education Sector in the Union Budget 2022-23
Review of EMIS in Ghana, Cambodia, Iraq, Nepal & Southern-Sudan
In view of progress made in India towards strengthening Educational Management Information System in India, a number of countries including Ghana, Sothern Sudan and Cambodia invited Prof. Arun C Mehta, Formally Professor & Head of the Department of EMIS, NIEPA, New Delhi to review their EMIS. Prof. Mehta while at NIEPA, New Delhi visited these countries, had intensive discussions on different aspects of EMIS and presented Mission Report to authorities many recommendations of which were implemented.
Under the leadership of Prof. Mehta, DISE-UDISE were developed in India which significantly addressed limitations in the EMIS which later awarded numerous national and regional awards including e-Governance, eINDIA, Manthan Shttp://www.udise.inouth Asia and EMPI Indian Express Innovation Awards.
