Girl child education in India 2018 to 2024.
Girl Child Education in India: Progress and Persistent Gaps [HTML Format]
Girl Child Education in India, Longitudinal Analysis by ArunCMehta UDISE+ 2018-19 to 2024-25 data [PDF]
Girl Child Education in India: Progress and Persistent Gaps
A Seven-Year Longitudinal Analysis Using UDISE+ 2018-19 to 2024-25
- 9.6% Girls’ secondary dropout 2024-25 — down from 17.1% in 2018-19
- 1.08 GPI at higher secondary — girls lead boys across all six years
- 54.2% Female teachers 2024-25 — majority since 2018-19
- 55.5% ST girls’ higher secondary GER — the persistent structural gap
Abstract
- This article presents a first-of-its-kind seven-year longitudinal analysis of gender indicators in Indian school education, drawing on verified data from six waves of UDISE+ (2018-19 to 2024-25), covering GER, GPI, dropout, transition, retention, and female teacher share — disaggregated by gender and by SC and ST categories.
- Girls have outperformed boys on every educational flow indicator throughout the entire period: lower dropout, higher transition, higher retention, and higher promotion rates at every level.
- Girls’ secondary dropout has nearly halved — from 17.1% (2018-19) to 9.6% (2024-25) — the single most significant gender equity improvement in this dataset.
- ST girls’ higher secondary GER has been structurally stuck between 44.4% and 55.5% throughout the period — never closing the gap to the national girls’ average of 60.9% (2024-25).
- All data are directly sourced and certified from original UDISE+ PDFs. No estimates used.
Introduction: A Story of Two Truths
- The story of girl child education in India, traced across seven years of Unified District Information System for Education Plus (UDISE+) data from 2018-19 to 2024-25, is one of the most significant equity stories in contemporary South Asia. It is simultaneously a story of genuine, measurable progress on some of the most stubborn indicators in education — and of equally persistent structural gaps that seven years of policy have not yet fully resolved.
- For the first time, this analysis draws on the complete available longitudinal dataset: six waves of extractable gender-disaggregated national data (2018-19, 2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25) covering Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER), Gender Parity Index (GPI), dropout rates, transition rates, retention rates, and female teacher share — all disaggregated by gender and by Scheduled Caste (SC) and Scheduled Tribe (ST) social categories. The 2019-20 UDISE+ publication was issued in predominantly image format without extractable statistical tables and is therefore not included.
- “Girls have outperformed boys on virtually every educational flow indicator throughout the entire seven-year period. And yet, the absolute levels of exclusion — particularly at secondary and higher secondary level for girls from Scheduled Tribe communities and in states like Bihar, West Bengal, and Madhya Pradesh — remain a structural emergency that progress alone has not resolved.”
- A critical methodological note applies to the entire analysis. UDISE+ underwent a fundamental transition beginning 2022-23, shifting from school-level aggregate reporting to individual student-wise tracking using Aadhaar-linked data, with revised population denominators based on updated SRS birth rate projections. This improved data accuracy substantially but limits strict cross-period comparability. The 2022-23 dropout spike is a methodology-transition artefact, not a ground-level reversal, as confirmed by the subsequent recovery in 2023-24 and 2024-25.
Section I: Gross Enrolment Ratio — Seven Years of Girls Leading Boys
The Gross Enrolment Ratio measures total enrolment as a percentage of the official age-group population. GER can exceed 100% where over-age or under-age children are enrolled. All values below are drawn directly from Table 5.1 (2018-19 to 2020-21) and Table 6.1 (2021-22 to 2024-25) of the respective UDISE+ publications.
| Year | Primary (I–V) | Upper Primary (VI–VIII) | Secondary (IX–X) | Higher Secondary (XI–XII) | Change in HS GER |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | 101.8% | 88.5% | 76.9% | 50.8% | — Baseline |
| 2020-21 | 104.5% | 92.7% | 79.5% | 54.6% | +3.8 pp |
| 2021-22 | 104.8% | 94.9% | 79.4% | 58.2% | +3.6 pp |
| 2022-23 † | 98.4% | 91.5% | 80.1% | 58.7% | +0.5 pp |
| 2023-24 | 94.3% | 90.6% | 78.0% | 58.2% | −0.5 pp |
| 2024-25 | 92.3% | 92.5% | 80.2% | 60.9% | +2.7 pp |
| Net change 2018-19 → 2024-25 | −9.5 pp | +4.0 pp | +3.3 pp | +10.1 pp |
Source: UDISE+ 2018-19 to 2024-25, Ministry of Education.
| Year | Primary (I–V) | Upper Primary (VI–VIII) | Secondary (IX–X) | Higher Secondary (XI–XII) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | 100.8% | 87.0% | 76.9% | 49.5% |
| 2020-21 | 102.2% | 91.6% | 80.1% | 53.0% |
| 2021-22 | 102.1% | 94.5% | 79.7% | 57.0% |
| 2022-23 † | 94.2% | 88.9% | 78.3% | 55.1% |
| 2023-24 | 91.8% | 88.9% | 76.8% | 54.4% |
| 2024-25 | 89.6% | 88.3% | 77.3% | 56.2% |
| Net change | −11.2 pp | +1.3 pp | +0.4 pp | +6.7 pp |
Source: Same Table 1.1.
Four structural findings emerge from the seven-year GER data.
Girls’ higher secondary GER has grown by 10.1 percentage points — from 50.8% in 2018-19 to 60.9% in 2024-25 — the strongest sustained gain at any level. Girls have led boys at higher secondary level in every year, with the advantage widening from 1.3 pp to 4.7 pp. Secondary GER has been broadly stable for both genders (76–80%), confirming this level as the key structural bottleneck. The apparent fall in primary GER across the 2021-22/2022-23 boundary is predominantly a denominator revision artefact.
educationforallinindia.com
COVID-19 Note (2020-21 and 2021-22)
Primary GER figures for 2020-21 (girls 104.5%) and 2021-22 (girls 104.8%) appear elevated because school-level aggregate reporting during COVID-19 school closures may have overstated enrolment relative to actual attendance. Secondary and higher secondary GER during these years is considered more reliable. Post-COVID individual student-wise tracking from 2022-23 produced more conservative and accurate figures.
Section II: Gender Parity Index — A Structural Achievement Confirmed Over Six Years
The GPI is defined as Girls’ GER ÷ Boys’ GER. A GPI of 1.0 indicates perfect parity; values above 1.0 indicate girls have proportionally higher enrolment. All values are from Table 5.7 (2018-19, 2020-21) and Table 6.7 (2021-22 to 2024-25); where PDFs report only one decimal place, the more precise value computed from verified GER figures is used.
| Year | Primary (I–V) | Upper Primary (VI–VIII) | Secondary (IX–X) | Higher Secondary (XI–XII) | Secondary Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | 1.01 | 1.02 | 1.00 | 1.03 | Perfect parity |
| 2020-21 | 1.02 | 1.01 | 0.99 | 1.03 | Only dip (COVID) |
| 2021-22 | 1.03 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.02 | Parity restored |
| 2022-23 | 1.05 | 1.03 | 1.02 | 1.07 | Girls ahead |
| 2023-24 | 1.03 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.07 | Girls ahead |
| 2024-25 | 1.03 | 1.05 | 1.04 | 1.08 | Girls significantly ahead |
GPI has been above 1.0 at all levels throughout the entire six-year period — with the sole exception of the COVID-impacted year 2020-21 when secondary GPI dipped marginally to 0.99, a finding consistent with documented evidence that school closures disproportionately affected girls’ access to remote learning (UNICEF, 2021). At higher secondary level, GPI has been above 1.02 throughout and reached 1.08 in 2024-25 — meaning for every 100 boys proportionally enrolled at higher secondary, 108 girls are represented.
Section III: Dropout Rates — The Most Dramatic Improvement in This Dataset
| Year | Primary (I–V) | Upper Primary (VI–VIII) | Secondary (IX–X) | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | 4.3% | 5.1% | 17.1% | Pre-individual tracking baseline |
| 2020-21 | 0.7% | 2.3% | 14.2% | COVID-affected year |
| 2021-22 | 1.4% | 3.3% | 12.3% | |
| 2022-23 † | 7.8% | 8.3% | 15.4% | †Methodology shift; exposed prior under-reporting |
| 2023-24 | 1.7% | 5.3% | 12.6% | |
| 2024-25 | 0.0% | 2.9% | 9.6% | Primary dropout effectively eliminated nationally |
Source: UDISE+ 2018-19 Table 5.13 (p83); 2020-21 Table 5.13 (p109); 2021-22 Table 6.13 (p121); 2022-23 Table 6.13 (p116); 2023-24 Table 6.13 (p119); 2024-25 Table 6.13 (p120).
| Year | Boys Primary | Girls Primary | Boys UP | Girls UP | Boys Secondary | Girls Secondary | Gender Gap (Secondary) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | 4.6% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 5.1% | 18.7% | 17.1% | 1.6 pp |
| 2020-21 | 0.8% | 0.7% | 1.6% | 2.3% | 14.9% | 14.2% | 0.7 pp |
| 2021-22 | 1.6% | 1.4% | 2.7% | 3.3% | 13.0% | 12.3% | 0.7 pp |
| 2022-23 † | 7.8% | 7.8% | 7.9% | 8.3% | 17.3% | 15.4% | 1.9 pp |
| 2023-24 | 2.1% | 1.7% | 5.2% | 5.3% | 15.5% | 12.6% | 2.9 pp |
| 2024-25 | 0.8% | 0.0% | 4.1% | 2.9% | 13.3% | 9.6% | 3.7 pp |
Source: UDISE+ respective years, Table 5.13/6.13.
Girls’ secondary dropout has very nearly halved — from 17.1% in 2018-19 to 9.6% in 2024-25. This is consistent across both the pre-tracking (2018-19 to 2021-22) and post-tracking (2022-23 to 2024-25) eras. An equally historic achievement: girls’ primary dropout reached 0.0% in 2024-25, effectively eliminating primary-level attrition for girls at the national level.
https://educationforallinindia.com
Section IV: Transition Rates — Girls Lead at Every Stage
| Year | Girls: Prim→UP | Boys: Prim→UP | Girls: UP→Sec | Boys: UP→Sec | Girls: Sec→HS | Boys: Sec→HS | Girls’ Adv (Sec→HS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | 90.8% | 90.2% | 88.4% | 91.3% | 70.2% | 67.5% | +2.7 pp |
| 2020-21 | 92.3% | 92.0% | 90.1% | 92.4% | 74.1% | 72.5% | +1.6 pp |
| 2021-22 | 93.4% | 93.0% | 87.8% | 89.7% | 79.3% | 77.6% | +1.7 pp |
| 2022-23 † | 88.1% | 87.7% | 86.1% | 87.2% | 73.4% | 69.5% | +3.9 pp |
| 2023-24 | 89.2% | 88.4% | 82.9% | 83.7% | 73.9% | 69.1% | +4.8 pp |
| 2024-25 | 93.0% | 91.5% | 87.3% | 85.9% | 77.9% | 72.4% | +5.5 pp |
| Net change girls’ Sec→HS | +7.7 pp | ||||||
Source: UDISE+ 2018-19 Table 5.14 (p84); 2020-21 Table 5.14 (p110); 2021-22 Table 6.14 (p122); 2022-23 Table 6.14 (p117); 2023-24 Table 6.14 (p120); 2024-25 Table 6.14 (p121). Boys|Girls|Total column order; Girls column extracted.
Critical Inflection Point
Despite consistent improvement, a Sec→HS transition of 77.9% for girls in 2024-25 means 1 in 5 girls who clears Class X does not proceed to Class XI. At ages 15–16, early marriage pressure, household responsibilities, and perceived diminishing returns to further education converge to drive exit at exactly this point. The challenge is structural, not informational — awareness campaigns have improved the rate; only school supply expansion and financial incentives can close the remaining gap.
https://educationforallinindia.com
Section V: Retention Rates — Girls Stay Longer, But Barely Half Reach Class XII
| Year | Girls: Prim (I–V) | Boys: Prim | Girls: Elem (I–VIII) | Boys: Elem | Girls: Sec (I–X) | Boys: Sec | Girls: HS (I–XII) | Boys: HS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | 86.9% | 85.8% | 71.9% | 70.5% | 58.0% | 58.3% | N/A | N/A |
| 2020-21 | 95.9% | 94.7% | 82.1% | 79.9% | 61.1% | 61.9% | 43.6% | 42.1% |
| 2021-22 | 96.0% | 94.9% | 82.1% | 80.5% | 64.5% | 64.9% | 44.2% | 43.1% |
| 2022-23 † | 91.2% | 90.7% | 76.4% | 75.2% | 66.1% | 64.9% | 45.1% | 43.2% |
| 2023-24 | 85.7% | 85.1% | 78.9% | 77.3% | 64.6% | 63.1% | 47.5% | 43.8% |
| 2024-25 | 93.4% | 91.5% | 84.2% | 81.5% | 64.2% | 61.7% | 49.6% | 45.0% |
| Girls’ HS gain (2020-21→2024-25) | +6.0 pp (43.6% → 49.6%) | |||||||
Source: UDISE+ 2018-19 Table 5.15 (p85); 2020-21 Table 5.15 (p111); 2021-22 Table 6.15 (p123); 2022-23 Table 6.15 (p118); 2023-24 Table 6.15 (p121); 2024-25 Table 6.15 (p122). N/A = higher secondary retention not separately reported in 2018-19 booklet. Girls column extracted.
Girls’ higher secondary retention has risen from 43.6% (2020-21) to 49.6% (2024-25) — approaching 50% for the first time. Elementary retention for girls improved sharply from 71.9% (2018-19) to 84.2% (2024-25), a 12.3 pp gain. However, girls’ secondary retention (Class I to X) has been broadly flat at 58–66% across the entire period, indicating that while individual-level dropout and transition improvements are occurring, the cumulative system effect has not yet translated into a strong improvement in overall secondary completion rates.
https://educationforallinindia.com
Section VI: Female Teachers — A Historic Structural Milestone
| Year | Male Teachers | Female Teachers | Total | Female % | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | 47,16,607 | 47,14,232 | 94,30,839 | 50.0% | — Baseline |
| 2020-21 | 47,49,351 | 49,47,074 | 96,96,425 | 51.0% | +1.0 pp |
| 2021-22 | 46,30,391 | 48,76,732 | 95,07,123 | 51.3% | +0.3 pp |
| 2022-23 | 45,20,047 | 49,63,247 | 94,83,294 | 52.3% | +1.0 pp |
| 2023-24 | 45,77,026 | 52,30,574 | 98,07,600 | 53.3% | +1.0 pp |
| 2024-25 | 46,40,803 | 54,81,617 | 1,01,22,420 | 54.2% | +0.9 pp |
| Net change 2018-19→2024-25 | +93,804 | +7,67,385 (+16.3%) | +6,91,581 | +4.2 pp |
Source: UDISE+ 2018-19 Table 2.12 (p25); 2020-21 Table 2.12 (p47); 2021-22 Table 4.12 (p55); 2022-23 Table 4.13 (p60); 2023-24 Table 4.13 (p63); 2024-25 Table 4.13 (p64). Total column (Male|Female|Total) extracted.
Female teachers have formed a majority of India’s teaching workforce at every data point in this series. Over six years, India added 7.67 lakh additional female teachers while male teacher numbers grew by fewer than 1 lakh. In 2024-25 there are 8.41 lakh more female teachers than male teachers. Research consistently links female teacher presence to reduced girls’ dropout and improved girls’ learning outcomes, particularly in secondary schools where girls face the highest exit risk (Muralidharan & Sheth, 2016). The critical policy gap is that this national majority is concentrated in urban primary schools; rural secondary schools — where girls need them most — remain disproportionately male-staffed.
Section VII: SC and ST Girls — Seven Years of Intersectional Analysis
| Year | All Girls Secondary | SC Girls Secondary | ST Girls Secondary | All Girls HS | SC Girls HS | ST Girls HS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | 76.9% | 83.6% | 78.7% | 50.8% | 53.2% | 44.4% |
| 2020-21 | 79.5% | 85.4% | 79.3% | 54.6% | 58.3% | 46.5% |
| 2021-22 | 79.4% | 85.6% | 79.2% | 58.2% | 63.7% | 53.6% |
| 2022-23 † | 80.1% | 84.6% | 80.6% | 58.7% | 62.6% | 55.9% |
| 2023-24 | 78.0% | 82.3% | 78.5% | 58.2% | 61.8% | 51.4% |
| 2024-25 | 80.2% | 84.8% | 83.8% | 60.9% | 63.9% | 55.5% |
| Net change | +3.3 pp | +1.2 pp | +5.1 pp | +10.1 pp | +10.7 pp | +11.1 pp |
Source: UDISE+ 2018-19 Tables 5.2 (p72), 5.3 (p73); 2020-21 Tables 5.2 (p98), 5.3 (p99); 2021-22 Tables 6.2 (p110), 6.3 (p111); 2022-23 Tables 6.2 (p105), 6.3 (p106); 2023-24 Tables 6.2 (p108), 6.3 (p109); 2024-25 Tables 6.2 (p109), 6.3 (p110). Girls column (Boys|Girls|Total) extracted. All values directly from PDFs; no estimates used.
SC girls have consistently recorded secondary GER above the national girls’ average throughout the period, reflecting the relative effectiveness of SC-specific scholarship and incentive schemes. Their higher secondary GER has risen from 53.2% to 63.9% — a 10.7 pp gain.
ST girls present a structurally different picture. Despite an 11.1 pp absolute improvement in higher secondary GER — from 44.4% to 55.5% — the gap between ST girls and the national girls’ average at higher secondary has not closed meaningfully: it was 6.4 pp below in 2018-19 and remains 5.4 pp below in 2024-25. Seven years of policy have not resolved the structural exclusion of tribal girls from higher secondary education: higher secondary schools are geographically absent from many tribal habitations, residential facilities are inadequate, and the medium of instruction rarely matches tribal mother tongues.
Section VIII: State-Level Analysis — Two Indias in One System
| State | Girls Sec Dropout 2018-19 | Girls Sec Dropout 2024-25 | Change | Status 2024-25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| West Bengal | 24.9% | 16.7% | −8.2 pp | ⚠ Crisis |
| Madhya Pradesh | 23.5% | 14.6% | −8.9 pp | ⚠ High |
| Assam | 26.4% | 13.7% | −12.7 pp | ⚠ Improving |
| Gujarat | 18.2% | 14.6% | −3.6 pp | ⚠ High |
| Karnataka | 16.8% | 13.2% | −3.6 pp | ⚠ Elevated |
| India (National) | 17.1% | 9.6% | −7.5 pp | Improving |
| Bihar | 14.9% | 6.8% | −8.1 pp | ✓ Better |
| Tamil Nadu | 6.3% | 4.5% | −1.8 pp | ✓ Good |
| Kerala | 5.8% | 3.7% | −2.1 pp | ✓ Best practice |
| Chandigarh | 3.2% | 1.1% | −2.1 pp | ✓ Best practice |
Source: UDISE+ 2018-19 Table 5.13 (p83) and 2024-25 Table 6.13 (p120), state-level Girls column.
| State | Girls Sec GER 2018-19 | Girls Sec GER 2024-25 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bihar | 62.1% | 54.8% | −7.3 pp ⚠ |
| Uttar Pradesh | 67.4% | 64.3% | −3.1 pp ⚠ |
| Rajasthan | 79.3% | 78.8% | −0.5 pp |
| India | 76.9% | 80.2% | +3.3 pp |
| Jharkhand | 64.4% | 72.8% | +8.4 pp ✓ |
| Assam | 74.2% | 89.7% | +15.5 pp ✓ |
| Tamil Nadu | 95.3% | 97.6% | +2.3 pp ✓ |
| Kerala | 97.2% | 99.4% | +2.2 pp ✓ |
| Chandigarh | 116.4% | 118.7% | +2.3 pp ✓ |
Source: UDISE+ 2018-19 Table 5.1 (p71) and 2024-25 Table 6.1 (p108), state-level Girls column.
The state-level data reveals the sharpest inequalities in the system. Bihar’s girls’ secondary GER — declining from 62.1% to 54.8% across the period — is partly attributable to revised population denominators (Bihar’s projected population has been substantially revised upward) but reflects a genuine infrastructure crisis: there are simply not enough secondary schools within reach of Bihar’s rural girls. Assam’s +15.5 pp improvement is the strongest in the country and demonstrates what sustained state-level investment in secondary school construction and girls’ residential facilities can achieve.
Section IX: Beti Bachao Beti Padhao — What Seven Years of UDISE+ Data Reveals
| Indicator | 2018-19 | 2024-25 | Change | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Girls’ Higher Secondary GER | 50.8% | 60.9% | +10.1 pp | ✓ Strong gain |
| Girls’ Secondary Dropout | 17.1% | 9.6% | −7.5 pp | ✓ Near halved |
| GPI at Higher Secondary | 1.03 | 1.08 | +0.05 | ✓ Improving |
| Girls’ Sec→HS Transition | 70.2% | 77.9% | +7.7 pp | ✓ Improving |
| Bihar Girls’ Secondary GER | 62.1% | 54.8% | −7.3 pp | ⚠ Declining |
| West Bengal Girls’ Sec Dropout | 24.9% | 16.7% | −8.2 pp | ⚠ Still crisis-level |
| ST Girls’ Higher Sec GER | 44.4% | 55.5% | +11.1 pp | ⚠ Gap not closed |
| Schools with Functional Girls’ Toilets (Table 8.8) | — | 93.8% | — | ✓ Only 6.2% lack |
Source: UDISE+ 2018-19 and 2024-25, Ministry of Education.
The UDISE+ evidence-base shows that BBBP has co-occurred with genuine improvements in girls’ higher secondary access, dropout reduction, and transition rates. However, strict attribution is not possible from UDISE+ data alone; the improvements interact with RTE implementation, Samagra Shiksha infrastructure investment, state-level schemes, and broader socioeconomic trends. What the data does clearly demonstrate is that BBBP’s demand-side mobilisation has not been sufficient to resolve the supply-side barriers — absent secondary schools in Bihar and UP, inadequate higher secondary access for tribal girls — that account for the majority of remaining gender exclusion.
Section X: Policy Recommendations — What Seven Years of Data Demand
Conclusion: Seven Years in Summary
The six-wave UDISE+ gender dataset (2018-19 to 2024-25) provides the most comprehensive longitudinal record yet assembled of India’s progress — and remaining gaps — on girl child education.
The progress is real, sustained, and structurally significant. Girls’ secondary dropout has nearly halved, from 17.1% to 9.6%. Girls’ higher secondary GER has risen 10.1 percentage points. GPI is above 1.0 at all levels in every year. Girls’ primary dropout has been effectively eliminated. Girls retain better than boys at every level. Female teachers now constitute 54.2% of the workforce, having grown from 50.0% in 2018-19.
The gaps are persistent, structural, and geographically concentrated. Bihar’s girls’ secondary GER stands at 54.8% — the lowest of any major state. ST girls’ higher secondary GER is stuck at 55.5% — 5.4 pp below the national girls’ average, a gap that has not closed in seven years. West Bengal’s girls’ secondary dropout at 16.7% is nearly double the national average. Around ~6.2% of the total schools in 2024-25 still lack a functional girls’ toilet.
The 2030 deadline under NEP 2020 is now four years away. The data to find every girl being lost from India’s school system now exists — in the UDISE+ individual tracking database. The question is whether the political will to act on that data exists too.
✓ What Has Been Achieved (2018-19 to 2024-25)
- Girls’ secondary dropout: 17.1% → 9.6%
- Girls’ primary dropout: 0.0% (eliminated nationally)
- Girls’ higher secondary GER: 50.8% → 60.9%
- Girls’ Sec→HS transition: 70.2% → 77.9%
- Girls’ HS retention: 43.6% → 49.6%
- GPI above 1.0 at all levels, all six years
- Female teachers: 50.0% → 54.2%
- Girls’ elementary retention: 71.9% → 84.2%
⚠ What Remains Unresolved
- Bihar girls’ secondary GER: 54.8% — lowest major state
- West Bengal girls’ sec dropout: 16.7% — near 2× national
- ST girls’ higher sec GER: 55.5% — gap unclosed in 7 years
- Girls’ secondary retention (I–X): flat at 58–66%
- ~6.2% of schools still lack functional girls’ toilets (Table 8.8)
- Female teachers concentrated in urban primary schools
- 1 in 5 girls exits at Secondary→HS: 22.1% gap
References
Suggested Reading
Mehta, A.C. (2026). educationforallinindia.com — Companion longitudinal analysis showing GER, dropout, and retention gaps against NEP 2030 targets for all students.
Mehta, A.C. (2025). educationforallinindia.com — Earlier single-year analysis providing additional state-level context for India’s gender equity story in schooling.
Mehta, A.C. (2025). educationforallinindia.com — Full national and state-level analysis of all flow rate indicators from UDISE+ 2024-25.
Ministry of Education, GoI (2020). The foundational policy document including gender equity commitments and 2030 universalisation targets.
Muralidharan, K. & Sheth, K. (2016). Journal of Human Resources — The landmark study on how female teacher deployment affects girls’ enrolment and dropout, directly relevant to Section VI.
Ministry of Women & Child Development, GoI. Official scheme documentation including objectives, target districts, and annual reports.
Department of School Education & Literacy, MoE. Primary source for all data cited in this article; enables state- and district-level downloads of all gender-disaggregated indicators.
United Nations (2015). Official SDG 4 targets including gender parity (Target 4.5) — the international framework within which India’s NEP 2030 commitments sit.
