Higher Education Development Index (HEDI) 2023-24
A composite ranking of all 36 States/UTs on Access, Equity, Teaching Resources and Institutional Capacity — built from the same AISHE 2023-24 data behind the Higher Education Report Cards, using the same transparent, formula-driven approach as SEDI 2025-26.
Highest · Puducherry
Lowest · Bihar
National mean
States/UTs ranked
Why a composite index?
The State/UT Report Cards answer “where does each state stand on any single indicator.” HEDI answers a harder question: taken together, which states are furthest ahead — or behind — overall?
Methodology at a glance
Four domains, each normalized 0–100 (min-max across the 36 States/UTs) and combined with editable weights.
30%
Access
GER (Total) & progress toward the NEP 2020 50%-GER-by-2035 target.
30%
Equity
Gender Parity Index, SC GER, ST GER, and faculty gender balance.
20%
Teaching Resources
Pupil-Teacher Ratio, Regular Mode (lower = better).
20%
Institutional Capacity
College density per lakh 18–23 population.
Full ranking: all 36 States & UTs
India shown as a reference line (not ranked) for comparison.
| Rank | State/UT | Region | Access | Equity | Teaching Resources |
Institutional Capacity |
HEDI Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Puducherry | South | 100.0 | 80.4 | 97.9 | 82.0 |
90.1
|
| 2 | Karnataka | South | 67.4 | 71.7 | 85.4 | 100.0 |
78.8
|
| 3 | Tamil Nadu | South | 84.7 | 77.5 | 89.6 | 59.0 |
78.4
|
| 4 | Telangana | South | 76.2 | 75.5 | 83.3 | 78.7 |
77.9
|
| 5 | Himachal Pradesh | North | 76.1 | 74.3 | 70.8 | 70.5 |
73.4
|
| 6 | Uttarakhand | Central | 80.0 | 67.8 | 72.9 | 57.4 |
70.4
|
| 7 | Andhra Pradesh | South | 54.9 | 63.2 | 87.5 | 70.5 |
67.0
|
| 8 | Kerala | South | 65.7 | 44.5 | 89.6 | 68.9 |
64.8
|
| 9 | Sikkim | Northeast | 68.4 | 69.7 | 83.3 | 27.9 |
63.7
|
| 10 | Mizoram | Northeast | 47.2 | 87.3 | 83.3 | 32.8 |
63.6
|
| 11 | Delhi | North | 85.2 | 72.5 | 77.1 | 0.0 |
62.7
|
| 12 | Maharashtra | West | 56.8 | 61.2 | 75.0 | 55.7 |
61.6
|
| 13 | Arunachal Pradesh | Northeast | 52.8 | 82.4 | 75.0 | 26.2 |
60.8
|
| 14 | Chandigarh | North | 89.4 | 56.1 | 75.0 | 9.8 |
60.6
|
| 15 | Goa | West | 51.9 | 60.3 | 89.6 | 44.3 |
60.4
|
| 16 | Manipur | Northeast | 45.4 | 70.4 | 85.4 | 39.3 |
59.7
|
| 17 | Haryana | North | 54.0 | 62.0 | 72.9 | 44.3 |
58.2
|
| 18 | Rajasthan | North | 43.3 | 53.0 | 66.7 | 63.9 |
55.0
|
| 19 | Punjab | North | 46.1 | 50.6 | 85.4 | 44.3 |
54.9
|
| 20 | Meghalaya | Northeast | 42.5 | 71.2 | 68.8 | 21.3 |
52.1
|
| 21 | Gujarat | West | 37.4 | 62.6 | 64.6 | 42.6 |
51.4
|
| 22 | Chhattisgarh | Central | 34.5 | 56.1 | 70.8 | 37.7 |
48.9
|
| 23 | Madhya Pradesh | Central | 42.4 | 55.8 | 62.5 | 32.8 |
48.5
|
| 24 | Odisha | East | 34.6 | 53.0 | 70.8 | 39.3 |
48.3
|
| 25 | Lakshadweep | South | 0.0 | 33.8 | 100.0 | 85.2 |
47.2
|
| 26 | Uttar Pradesh | Central | 36.6 | 59.6 | 50.0 | 37.7 |
46.4
|
| 27 | Nagaland | Northeast | 22.0 | 54.3 | 85.4 | 31.1 |
46.2
|
| 28 | Andaman & Nicobar Islands | South | 12.5 | 56.6 | 91.7 | 14.8 |
42.0
|
| 29 | Assam | Northeast | 24.9 | 59.5 | 68.8 | 14.8 |
42.0
|
| 30 | Jammu & Kashmir | North | 27.9 | 45.1 | 75.0 | 19.7 |
40.8
|
| 31 | West Bengal | East | 33.8 | 44.8 | 62.5 | 13.1 |
38.7
|
| 32 | Tripura | Northeast | 30.7 | 50.0 | 45.8 | 8.2 |
35.0
|
| 33 | Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu | West | 6.7 | 33.9 | 79.2 | 11.5 |
30.3
|
| 34 | Ladakh | North | 9.5 | 19.1 | 93.8 | 14.8 |
30.3
|
| 35 | Jharkhand | East | 24.0 | 43.3 | 18.8 | 1.6 |
24.3
|
| 36 | Bihar | East | 20.3 | 37.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
17.4
|
| – | India (reference) | – | 44.3 | 59.1 | 72.9 | 39.3 | 53.5 |
Regional pattern: South leads, East lags sharply
Average HEDI score by region. The South’s average is more than double the East’s — and every East-region State/UT sits in the bottom half of the national table.
(8 States/UTs)
68.3
(8 States/UTs)
54.5
(4 States/UTs)
53.6
(8 States/UTs)
52.9
(4 States/UTs)
50.9
(4 States/UTs)
32.2
Where one domain masks another
Averaging four domains can hide a state that’s excellent in one dimension and badly deficient in another. Some standout cases:
Most uneven — one domain props up the rest
Delhi Access 85Capacity 0
Ranks 11th overall — excellent enrolment access, but near-zero college density given its small, dense urban geography.
Chandigarh Access 89Capacity 10
Ranks 14th — the same urban-density story as Delhi pulls it far below where its Access score alone would place it.
Lakshadweep Teaching 100Access 0
Ranks 25th — a tiny enrolment base mechanically produces a perfect PTR score alongside the country’s lowest GER.
Most balanced — no domain is an outlier
Himachal Pradesh Rank 5
Every domain scores 70–76 — consistently strong rather than propped up by one standout indicator.
Telangana Rank 4
Every domain scores 75–83, the tightest spread among the top 10.
Puducherry Rank 1
Strong-to-excellent (80–100) across all four domains — the national leader is not a one-metric outlier.
Data limitations
Disclosed plainly, not buried — five things about how this index is built that a careful reader should know before treating any single rank as definitive.
How this compares to the only prior academic HEDI
References
- Mehta, A.C. (2026). Higher Education in India: Where Do We Stand? All-India and State/UT Report Cards, 2023-24. Based on AISHE 2023-24, UDISE+ 2025-26, and Union Budget 2026-27. educationforallinindia.com
- Mehta, A.C. (2026). School Education Development Index (SEDI) 2025-26. educationforallinindia.com
- Jain, I. & Gulati, R. (2024/2025). “How has higher education developed in India? Evidence using a ‘benefit-of-the-doubt’ based multidimensional index approach.” Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, Emerald Publishing. DOI: 10.1108/JARHE-02-2024-0107
- Ministry of Education, GoI. National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF), since 2016. nirfindia.org
- NIEPA. Educational Development Index (EDI), 2005-06 to 2014-15. Referenced via educationforallinindia.com
- AISHE 2023-24 (Tables 1a, 4, 6, 19, 20, 22, 25 and national 5-year trend tables), Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Education, GoI.





