Top 10 online tutoring websites
1. Tutor.com
Overview & years in operation: Founded in 1998, Tutor.com is one of the oldest commercial online tutoring services and works both direct-to-consumer and via school/library/employer partnerships.
Pricing: Multiple plans: pay-as-you-go hourly or subscription-style packages through partner programs; pricing depends on plan and subject.
Pros
- Long track record and institutional partnerships (libraries, schools, employers).
- On-demand help across many academic levels and subjects.
Cons
- Pricing and plans can be structured differently via partners (so direct comparison is sometimes hard).
- Large platforms sometimes report uneven tutor quality in specific niche topics.
Ease of use: Platform built for quick matching and a simple online classroom; commonly used by institutions and students.
Subject coverage: Wide – K–12 through college, test prep, vocational subjects.
Quality of tutors: Mix of certified teachers, graduate students, subject experts; platform uses vetting processes, but quality can vary by subject.
Reviews on major platforms: Institutional customers often cite usefulness; public reviews vary and occasionally raise privacy/data concerns tied to ownership/partnerships in media coverage (see recent reporting).
Customer-care responsiveness & refunds: Tutor.com publishes FAQs and refund/guarantee policies (e.g., “Better Grades” style guarantees via some programs); responsiveness is generally via website/partner channels — experiences in reviews are mixed.
-
My Engineering Buddy (MEB)
Overview & years in operation: My Engineering Buddy (MEB) began (as My Physics Buddy earlier) and is listed on its site with operations traced to about 2008–2011, depending on the page; it positions itself as a specialist in engineering and STEM tutoring.
Pricing: Site lists hourly starts from about USD 20/hr for one-to-one tutoring and test-prep. Pricing pages and sample rates are published on the company website.
Pros
- Focused on engineering and advanced STEM topics (100+ advanced subjects), which can be useful for engineering students.
- Offers homework, lab/project, and test-prep support in engineering-specific tools and platforms.
Cons
- Smaller, specialist providers sometimes have less geographic reach and fewer instant-match options versus very large marketplaces.
- Public review volume is smaller than global marketplaces (fewer independent review data points).
Ease of use: Website and contact options (WhatsApp/email) aim to make booking and quick matching straightforward; interface and onboarding are less marketplace-like and more service-oriented.
Subject coverage: Deep in engineering disciplines (electrical, mechanical, aerospace, etc.), plus related math and test prep.
Quality of tutors: Company highlights subject-specialist tutors and examples of senior tutors; as with many smaller specialist platforms, tutor quality is often cited as good by students who need niche/advanced help, but third-party, large-scale ratings are limited.
Reviews on major platforms: MEB hosts customer testimonials on its site; independent review coverage is smaller than for U.S./EU marketplaces.
Customer-care responsiveness & refunds: Contact channels include WhatsApp/email and site forms; company documents indicate case-by-case handling of refunds/estimates. Public reports suggest responsive tutor matching for many engineering queries, but formal refund policies are not as widely publicised as on large marketplaces.
-
Wyzant
Overview & years in operation: Founded in 2005, Wyzant is a U.S.-based tutoring marketplace where individual tutors set rates and students book directly.
Pricing: Tutors set their own hourly rates; Wyzant reports typical ranges and an average (example: many tutors are $35–60/hr, though rates vary by subject and experience). No mandatory subscription.
Pros
- Large US tutor marketplace with broad subject and geographic coverage.
- Flexible: pay only for booked hours; students can compare profiles and reviews.
Cons
- Quality and price vary widely because the marketplace model depends on individual tutors.
Ease of use: Profile search, filtering, messaging, and in-platform lessons are well-developed; matching requires active choice by the student.
Subject coverage: Very broad — academic subjects, test prep, niche topics, hobbies.
Quality of tutors: Mixed; the platform offers verified credentials for some tutors and student reviews to help evaluate fit.
Reviews on major platforms: Generally positive for the marketplace model, though price and tutor variability appear in reviews. (See Wyzant’s own rate information and independent reviews.)
Customer-care responsiveness & refunds: Wyzant provides support and dispute processes; because payments are tutor-specific, refund outcomes depend on policy and circumstances.
-
Preply
Overview & years in operation: Launched in 2012 as a language-learning marketplace with offices across Europe and the U.S. — now one of the largest language-tutor marketplaces.
Pricing: Lesson prices set by tutors; Preply advertises very competitive starting prices (examples often show lessons from low double digits in USD/€ depending on tutor). They offer trial lessons and a “tutor replacement” policy in some cases.
Pros
- Large choice of language tutors, strong recommendation/matching engine.
- Transparent tutor ratings and trial options.
Cons
- Quality is variable across thousands of tutors; the best tutors can get booked quickly.
Ease of use: Modern marketplace UX, mobile apps, lesson booking, and payments in-platform.
Subject coverage: Primarily languages (many languages), some general tutoring categories, but strongest in language instruction.
Quality of tutors: Ratings shown on each profile (Preply displays average tutor ratings and number of students).
Reviews on major platforms: Preply cites large positive review counts on its site; independent press pieces note rapid user growth and strong demand.
Customer-care responsiveness & refunds: Preply offers tutor replacement and customer support via website; specific refund terms depend on package and local rules.
-
Varsity Tutors
Overview & years in operation: Founded in 2007, Varsity Tutors grew into a large U.S. tutoring platform offering private lessons, live groups, and school/district solutions.
Pricing: Offers single lessons, packages, and subscription-style memberships; prices vary considerably by subject, tutor level, and lesson format.
Pros
- Strong focus on test prep and structured programs.
- Robust platform features (recording, whiteboard, scheduling).
Cons
- Higher-end rates for top subject-matter experts; subscription prices for ongoing programs can be substantial.
Ease of use: Full-featured platform; onboarding is straightforward for students and institutions.
Subject coverage & tutor quality: Wide subject coverage; vetting tends to favour experienced tutors and specialists.
Reviews on major platforms: Mixed-to-positive; many institutions cite benefit in scaling tutoring, but individual consumer reviews note price variance.
Customer-care responsiveness & refunds: Varsity Tutors provides support and structured program guarantees in some cases; policies vary by product.
-
GoStudent
Overview & years in operation: Founded in Austria and scaled rapidly in Europe; positioned as a subscription-based tutoring service for school-age students.
Pricing: Membership-based pricing with examples (price per lesson decreases with more frequent lessons or longer commitments); sample starting points shown on their pricing page.
Pros
- Focus on K–12, curriculum-aligned lessons, and structured memberships.
- Strong European coverage and app-centric UX.
Cons
- The membership/subscription model may be less flexible for one-off lessons or irregular users.
Ease of use: App and web booking with scheduled lessons and assigned tutors; designed for recurring tutoring.
Subject coverage: K–12 core subjects, test prep, and language support.
Quality of tutors: Vetted tutors with a focus on matching to student level; independent reviews show good outcomes for many students.
Customer-care responsiveness & refunds: Membership terms require attention; GoStudent’s site details membership and cancellation mechanics — responsiveness generally reported as fair in user accounts.
-
Superprof
Overview & years in operation: Paris-based marketplace connecting tutors and students across many subjects; tutors set their rates.
Pricing: Tutor-set pricing; platform often highlights free introductory lessons and flexible arrangements.
Pros
- Very broad subject and skill coverage (academic, music, sports, hobbies).
- Strong European presence and many local tutors.
Cons
- As a large listing site, quality control and refund issues are sometimes flagged in independent reviews.
Ease of use: Simple listing/search model; contact tutors directly and arrange lessons.
Subject coverage & tutor quality: Extremely broad; tutor quality varies widely since individuals create profiles and set offerings.
Reviews on major platforms: Mixed: many successful matches, some complaints about hidden fees or refund handling in third-party reviews.
Customer-care responsiveness & refunds: Platform supports tutors and students, but refund/fee disputes are sometimes reported in Trustpilot-style reviews — check the specific tutor’s terms before booking.
-
TutorMe
Overview & years in operation: U.S.-based online tutoring platform notable for on-demand help and a large tutor base (founded in the 2010s).
Pricing: Mix of pay-as-you-go and monthly plans; common market rate examples reported in reviews around mid-$20s–$60/hr depending on package.
Pros
- Fast on-demand help across many subjects; useful for quick homework support.
Cons
- Independent reviews and Trustpilot threads show both positive tutor experiences and some service/support complaints (typical of high-volume platforms).
Ease of use: Designed for quick sessions with an integrated online classroom.
Subject coverage & tutor quality: Broad subject list; tutor experience varies, but the platform uses matching and ratings.
Customer-care responsiveness & refunds: Experiences are mixed in public reviews; TutorMe provides support and package-based terms.
-
Skooli
Overview & years in operation: Skooli is an online tutoring platform (founded mid-2010s by education/edtech founders) that offers pay-as-you-go and pre-purchased plans.
Pricing: Pay-as-you-go model (examples show ~$0.65–$0.83 per minute, or roughly $39–$50/hr depending on plan), plus pre-purchased packages.
Pros
- Pay-for-what-you-use model; simple per-minute pricing for short help sessions.
Cons
- Per-minute pricing can be less predictable for longer, structured lessons. Some independent reviewers flag refund and tutor-response issues.
Ease of use: On-platform classroom and booking; straightforward for short sessions.
Customer-care responsiveness & refunds: Official FAQs describe pricing and payment; independent reviews caution that refunds can be limited, and that the refund policy should be read carefully.
-
Khan Academy
Overview & years in operation: Founded by Sal Khan and launched publicly around 2008, Khan Academy is a free, donation-funded nonprofit offering video lessons, practice exercises, and teacher tools. It is not a 1:1 paid tutoring marketplace, but it is widely used as free tutoring-style content.
Pricing: Free for learners; funded by donations and partners.
Pros
- Free, high-quality videos, practice exercises, and structured curricula for K–12 and early college topics. Widely used in classrooms and for self-study.
Cons
- Not a substitute for live, personalised 1:1 tutoring when a student needs interactive, bespoke help; no paid tutor matching on-platform.
Ease of use: Very accessible site and apps, designed for self-paced learning.
Subject coverage & quality: Extensive content library across math, science, computing, and humanities; content is produced and reviewed by educators.
Customer-care responsiveness & refunds: Not applicable in the conventional paid-service sense; support is via help center and community resources.
How to read this list and choose what’s right for you
- If you need fast, general help across many subjects, look at on-demand marketplaces like Tutor.com, TutorMe, or Wyzant. They have large tutor pools, but tutor quality varies by subject and price.
- If you need engineering / specialized STEM help: My Engineering Buddy is a specialist option focusing on engineering coursework and projects; larger marketplaces also host engineering experts, but search effort may be higher.
- If you want curriculum-aligned, recurring lessons for school kids, subscription services like GoStudent or institution-facing programs from Varsity Tutors work well.
- If budget is critical, marketplace tutor-set pricing (Preply, Superprof) and free resources (Khan Academy) offer options — but check tutor ratings and trial policies.
Final practical tips
- Check founding/longevity: older platforms often have institutional procedures; newer marketplaces can be more flexible but also more variable.
- Compare actual tutor profiles, not just platform blurbs: look at recent student reviews, credentials, and lesson recordings where available.
- Trial lessons and replacement/refund policies matter: platforms differ (Preply advertises tutor replacements; others have varying refund terms). Read the small print before prepaying.
- If you need highly specialised help (advanced engineering, labs, software), specialist providers such as My Engineering Buddy or platform tutors with clear project/industry experience tend to be a better initial filter.


