Does AI Threaten the Purpose of College Education in India?

Does AI Threaten the Purpose of College Education in India?

Does AI Threaten the Purpose of College Education in India?

Introduction

The rapid rise of artificial intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT is reshaping higher education globally, sparking debates about the role of college in an era where assignments can be completed in minutes and grading is increasingly automated. An insightful article published in The Economic Times on May 28, 2025, titled “Does College Still Have a Purpose in the Age of ChatGPT?” explores these challenges, highlighting AI’s widespread use by students and professors, threats to academic integrity, and the need for clear policies and innovative assessments to preserve education’s value. While the article provides valuable insights, its Western-centric perspective prompts a critical examination of its relevance to India, where digital access, socio-economic disparities, and educational infrastructure vary significantly.

At Education for All in India, our mission is to promote equitable access to quality education. This article reviews the Economic Times piece, assesses whether India has reached the described AI-driven academic state, and examines its implications for rural areas, low-income students, and the digital divide. It also explores the timeline for widespread AI integration in Indian higher education and evaluates current and potential AI applications in colleges. Our goal is to inform educators, policymakers, and students about creating an inclusive, AI-enhanced educational landscape in India.

Review of Literature

The Economic Times article argues that AI tools like ChatGPT are widely used for academic tasks, with students outsourcing assignments and professors using AI for grading, creating a crisis of academic integrity. It notes limitations in AI detection tools, which struggle with false positives and evasion. The article advocates for clear AI policies, in-class assessments, and improved detection technologies while emphasizing college’s non-vocational value—fostering critical thinking, character, and civic awareness.

Does AI Threaten the Purpose of College Education

Does-AI-Threaten-the-Purpose-of-College-Education

Supporting literature partially validates these claims. A 2024 study in the International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education found that 60% of college students in developed nations use AI for assignments, raising plagiarism concerns. In India, urban students increasingly rely on AI, though rural colleges lag due to infrastructure and digital literacy gaps, as noted in a 2025 Times of India report. The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 promotes technology integration but faces implementation challenges, particularly for low-income and rural students. These sources provide a foundation for evaluating the article’s relevance to India’s diverse educational context.

Critical Analysis of the Article

Strengths

  • Timely Topic: The article addresses AI’s impact on higher education, a pressing issue for stakeholders navigating technological disruption.
  • Balanced Perspective: It acknowledges AI’s vocational benefits (e.g., preparing students for AI-driven workplaces) while defending college’s non-vocational goals, such as critical thinking and civic engagement, aligning with equitable education principles.
  • Practical Solutions: Recommendations like clear AI policies, in-class assessments (e.g., paper-based or oral exams), and improved detection tools are actionable and draw on precedents like honor codes.
  • Engaging Style: The conversational yet authoritative tone and logical structure make the article accessible to educators, policymakers, and students.

Weaknesses

  • Lack of Evidence: The article relies on vague “recent reports,” weakening its credibility for evidence-based discussions.
  • Overgeneralization: It assumes a uniform academic environment, ignoring variations across countries and socio-economic contexts, particularly in rural India.
  • Limited Ethical Depth: It does not fully explore ethical implications of AI-driven grading or biases in detection tools, which could disproportionately affect marginalized students.
  • Western-Centric Focus: Its perspective overlooks India’s unique challenges, such as digital access and educational priorities.

Overall Assessment

The article highlights AI’s challenges and opportunities in higher education but is limited by its lack of empirical evidence and Western-centric lens. Its recommendations are practical but require adaptation to India’s diverse educational landscape to ensure equity.

India-Specific Considerations

Has India Reached This State?

The Economic Times article depicts widespread AI use for academic tasks, creating challenges for integrity and learning. In India, this applies primarily to urban elite institutions:

  • Urban Elite Institutions: Institutions like the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs), Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs), and private universities (e.g., Ashoka University) use AI for personalized learning, virtual labs, and grading. Students leverage tools like ChatGPT, mirroring the article’s concerns. Many colleges lack clear AI policies, with some banning tools outright and others allowing supervised use.
  • Limited Scale: Widespread AI use is not universal due to infrastructural and socio-economic barriers, particularly in rural and mid-tier institutions.

Conclusion: India has partially reached the article’s state in urban elite settings but not across its broader higher education system.

Rural Areas and Low-Income Students

The article assumes widespread AI access, which is not feasible for rural and low-income students in India:

  • Rural Areas:
    • Infrastructure Barriers: Rural colleges lack reliable electricity, internet, and devices, limiting AI adoption. A 2025 report notes unreliable power and connectivity challenges.
    • Digital Literacy: Students and faculty lack skills to use AI effectively.
    • Teacher Shortages: Understaffing hinders AI integration in rural institutions.
  • Low-Income Students
    • Access Challenges: Many cannot afford devices or internet, essential for AI tools. A 2025 report notes that 70% of Indian children attend low-income schools with limited tech access .
    • Educational Disparities: Rural college enrollment (18.7%) lags behind urban areas (21.6%), risking wider gaps without intervention.
    • Economic Constraints: Public colleges are affordable, but private institutions serving low-income students lack AI infrastructure .

Conclusion: Rural and low-income students face significant barriers, making the article’s scenario largely inapplicable to these groups.

The Digital Divide

The digital divide is a critical obstacle to AI integration in Indian higher education:

  • Connectivity: Poor internet access in rural areas limits AI tool usage.
  • Device Access: Many students rely on shared or outdated devices, restricting AI adoption.
  • Digital Literacy: Under-resourced institutions lack AI proficiency.
  • Funding Gaps: Low education spending (less than 3.5% of GDP) hinders digital infrastructure.

Solutions:

  • Expand broadband and device access via Digital India .
  • Implement digital literacy programs for students and faculty.
  • Develop low-bandwidth or offline AI tools for rural areas.

Conclusion: The digital divide limits AI’s impact, requiring targeted interventions for equity.

Timeline for India to Reach the Article’s State

Achieving widespread AI integration in Indian colleges requires addressing:

  • Infrastructure: Nationwide high-speed internet and device access could take 5–10 years.
  • Digital Literacy: Training programs may require 3–7 years.
  • Policy Standardization: Consistent AI policies could take 3–5 years.
  • Economic Equity: Subsidizing access for low-income students may take a decade.

Estimated Timeline: Urban elite institutions could align with the article’s scenario in 7–10 years (2032–2035), while rural colleges may need 10–15 years (2035–2040) with sustained investment.

Current and Potential AI Use in Indian Colleges

AI adoption in Indian colleges varies:

  • Elite Institutions: IITs, IIMs, and private universities use AI for personalized learning, virtual labs, and grading, though ethical guidelines are inconsistent.
  • Mid-Tier and Rural Colleges: Limited by infrastructure and training, these institutions rely on traditional methods with minimal AI use.
  • Emerging Trends: NEP 2020 and IndiaAI promote AI, but implementation is slow. EdTech platforms like BYJU’S use AI but are costly for low-income students.

Possibilities

  • Clear Policies: Adopt honour codes and AI guidelines, balancing supervised use with penalties for misuse.
  • In-Class Assessments: Use paper-based or oral exams to reduce AI misuse, with faculty support.
  • AI Detection Tools: Develop affordable, India-specific tools to maintain integrity.
  • Equity-Focused Solutions: Create low-bandwidth AI tools and subsidize access for rural and low-income students.
  • Faculty Training: Enhance digital and AI literacy to improve teaching efficiency.

Conclusion: AI use is fragmented, with elite institutions leading and rural colleges lagging. Tailored strategies can align India with the article’s vision while ensuring equity.

Concluding Observations

The Economic Times article raises critical questions about AI’s impact on higher education, advocating for policies and assessments to preserve academic integrity and college’s value. While its insights are valuable, its Western-centric focus requires adaptation for India, where urban elite institutions adopt AI, but rural and low-income students face barriers due to the digital divide. Achieving widespread AI integration may take 7–15 years, depending on infrastructure, training, and equity investments. By adopting clear policies, developing affordable AI tools, and prioritizing access for underserved communities, Indian colleges can harness AI to enhance education while aligning with the mission of Education for All in India to promote equitable, quality education.

Suggested Readings

Education for All in India